Welcome to BlackPolitics.com. Weigh-in on the issues. Take a poll, register, post your comments, and stay involved.
strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_argument::init() should be compatible with views_handler::init(&$view, $options) in /srv/www/drupal6/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/views_handler_argument.inc on line 744.

The RICH Economy

Posted by: BPC
Date Posted: October 7, 2011

by Robert Anton Wilson
from The Illuminati Papers

INTRODUCTION:
Robert Anton Wilson was an American author, polymath and self-described agnostic mystic. Wilson described his work as an "attempt to break down conditioned associations, to look at the world in a new way, with many models recognized as models or maps, and no one model elevated to the truth". He described his goal as being "to try to get people into a state of generalized agnosticism, not agnosticism about God alone but agnosticism about everything".

Below is a piece he wrote titled "The Rich Economy" which presents alternative approaches to economic policy. It is presented here to hopefully serve as a vehicle to help our readers be open to, and even create their own ideas about, new and different approaches to solving our economic issues. Enjoy!

 

If there is one proposition which currently wins the assent of nearly everybody, it is that we need more jobs. "A cure for unemployment" is promised, or earnestly sought, by every Heavy Thinker from Jimmy Carter to the Communist Party USA, from Ronald Reagan to the head of the economics department at the local university, from the Birchers to the New Left.

I would like to challenge that idea. I don't think there is, or ever again can be, a cure for unemployment. I propose that unemployment is not a disease, but the natural, healthy functioning of an advanced technological society.

The inevitable direction of any technology, and of any rational species such as Homo sap., is toward what Buckminster Fuller calls ephemeralization, or doing-more-with-less. For instance, a modern computer does more (handles more bits of information) with less hardware than the proto-computers of the late '40's and '50's. One worker with a modern teletype machine does more in an hour than a thousand medieval monks painstakingly copying scrolls for a century. Atomic fission does more with a cubic centimeter of matter than all the engineers of the 19th Century could do with a million tons, and fusion does even more.

Unemployment is not a disease; so it has no "cure."

This tendency toward ephemeralization or doing more-with-less is based on two principal factors, viz:

  1. The increment-of-association, a term coined by engineer C.H. Douglas, a meaning simply that when we combine our efforts we can do more than the sum of what each of us could do seperately. Five people acting synergetically together can lift a small modern car, but if each of the five tries separately, the car will not budge. As society evolved from tiny bands, to larger tribes, to federations of tribes, to city-states, to nations, to multinational alliances, the increment-of-association increased exponentially. A stone-age hunting band could not build the Parthenon; a Renaissance city-state could not put Neil Armstrong on the Moon. When the increment-of-association increases, through larger social units, doing-more-with-less becomes increasingly possible.
  2. Knowledge itself is inherently self-augmenting. Every discovery "suggests" further discoveries; every innovation provokes further innovations. This can be seen concretely, in the records of the U.S. Patent Office, where you will find more patents granted every year than were granted the year before, in a rising curve that seems to be headed toward infinity. If Inventor A can make a Whatsit out of 20 moving parts, Inventor B will come along and build a Whatsit out of 10 moving parts. If the technology of 1900 can get 100 ergs out of a Whatchamacallum, the technology of 1950 can get 1,000 ergs. Again, the tendency is always toward doing-more-with-less.

Unemployment is directly caused by this technological capacity to do more-with-less. Thousands of monks were technologically unemployed by Gutenberg. Thousands of blacksmiths were technologically unemployed by Ford's Model T. Each device that does-more-with-less makes human labor that much less necessary.

Aristotle said that slavery could only be abolished when machines were built that could operate themselves. Working for wages, the modern equivalent of slavery -- very accurately called "wage slavery" by social critics -- is in the process of being abolished by just such self-programming machines. In fact, Norbert Wiener, one of the creators of cybernetics, foresaw this as early as 1947 and warned that we would have massive unemployment once the computer revolution really got moving.

It is arguable, and I for one would argue, that the only reason Wiener's prediction has not totally been realized yet -- although we do have ever-increasing unemployment -- is that big unions, the corporations, and government have all tacitly agreed to slow down the pace of cybernation, to drag their feet and run the economy with the brakes on. This is because they all, still, regard unemployment as a "disease" and cannot imagine a "cure" for the nearly total unemployment that full cybernation will create.

Suppose, for a moment, we challenge this Calvinistic mind-set. Let us regard wage-work -- as most people do, in fact, regard it -- as a curse, a drag, a nuisance, a barrier that stands between us and what we really want to do. In that case, your job is the disease, and unemployment is the cure.

"But without working for wages we'll all starve to death!?! Won't we?"

Not at all. Many farseeing social thinkers have suggested intelligent and plausible plans for adapting to a society of rising unemployment. Here are some examples.

  1. The National Dividend. This was invented by engineer C. H. Douglas and has been revived with some modifications by poet Ezra Pound and designer Buckminster Fuller. The basic idea (although Douglas, Pound, and Fuller differ on the details) is that every citizen should be declared a shareholder in the nation, and should receive dividends on the Gross National Product for the year. Estimates differ as to how much this would be for each citizen, but at the current level of the GNP it is conservative to say that a share would be worth several times as much, per year, as a welfare recipient receives -- at least five times more. Critics complain that this would be inflationary. Supporters of the National Dividend reply that it would only be inflationary if the dividends distributed were more than the GNP; and they are proposing only to issue dividends equal to the GNP.
  2. The Guaranteed Annual Income. This has been urged by economist Robert Theobald and others. The government would simply establish an income level above the poverty line and guarantee that no citizen would receive less; if your wages fall below that level, or you have no wages, the government makes up the difference. This plan would definitely cost the government less than the present welfare system, with all its bureaucratic red tape and redundancy: a point worth considering for those conservatives who are always complaining about the high cost of welfare. It would also spare the recipients the humiliation, degradation and dehumanization built into the present welfare system: a point for liberals to consider. A system that is less expensive than welfare and also less debasing to the poor, it seems to me, should not be objectionable to anybody but hardcore sadists.
  3. The Negative Income Tax. This was first devised by Nobel economist Milton Friedman and is a less radical variation on the above ideas. The Negative Income Tax would establish a minimum income for every citizen; anyone whose income fell below that level would receive the amount necessary to bring them up to that standard. Friedman, who is sometimes called a conservative but prefers to title himself a libertarian, points out that this would cost "the government" (i.e. the taxpayers) less than the present welfare system, like Theobald's Guaranteed Annual Income. It would also dispense with the last tinge of humiliation associated with government "charity," since when you cashed a check from IRS nobody (not even your banker) would know if it was supplementary income due to poverty or a refund due to overpayment of last year's taxes.
  4. The RICH Economy. This was devised by inventor L. Wayne Benner (co-author with Timothy Leary of Terra II) in collaboration with the present author. It's a four-stage program to retool society for the cybernetic and space-age future we are rapidly entering. RICH means Rising Income through Cybernetic Homeostasis.
    • Stage I
      is to recognize that cybernation and massive unemployment are inevitable and to encourage them. This can be done by offering a $100,000 reward to any worker who can design a machine that will replace him or her, and all others doing the same work. In other words, instead of being dragged into the cybernetic age kicking and screaming, we should charge ahead bravely, regarding the Toilless Society as the Utopian goal humanity has always sought.
    • Stage II
      is to establish either the Negative Income Tax or the Guaranteed Annual Income, so that the massive unemployment caused by Stage I will not throw hordes of people into the degradation of the present welfare system.
    • Stage III
      is to gradually, experimentally, raise the Guaranteed Annual Income to the level of the National Dividend suggested by Douglas, Bucky Fuller, and Ezra Pound, which would give every citizen the approximate living standard of the comfortable middle class. The reason for doing this gradually is to pacify those conservative economists who claim that the National Dividend is "inflationary" or would be practically wrecking the banking business by lowering the interest rate to near-zero. It is our claim that this would not happen as long as the total dividends distributed to the populace equaled the Gross National Product. but since this is a revolutionary and controversial idea, it would be prudent, we allow, to approach it in slow steps, raising the minimum income perhaps 5 per cent per year for the first ten years. And, after the massive cybernation caused by Stage I has produced a glut of consumer goods, experimentally raise it further and faster toward the level of a true National Dividend.
    • Stage IV
      is a massive investment in adult education, for two reasons.
      1. People can spend only so much time fucking, smoking dope, and watching TV; after a while they get bored. This is the main psychological objection to the workless society, and the answer to it is to educate people for functions more cerebral than fucking, smoking dope, watching TV, or the idiot jobs most are currently toiling at.
      2. There are vast challenges and opportunities confronting us in the next three or four decades, of which the most notable are those highlighted in Tim Leary's SMI2LE slogan -- Space Migration, Intelligence Increase, Life Extension. Humanity is about to enter an entirely new evolutionary relationship to space, time, and consciousness. We will no longer be limited to one planet, to a brief, less-than-a-century lifespan, and to the stereotyped and robotic mental processes by which most people currently govern their lives. Everybody deserves the chance, if they want it, to participate in the evolutionary leap to what Leary calls "more space, more time, and more intelligence to enjoy space and time."

Delve the GALACTIC ARCHIVES for an amusing tale from the future:

"President Hubbard's first step in establishing the RICH Economy was to offer a prize of $50,000 per year to any worker who could design a machine that would replace him or her."

What I am proposing, in brief, is that the Work Ethic (find a Master to employ you for wages, or live in squalid poverty) is obsolete. A Work Esthetic will have to arise to replace this old Stone Age syndrome of the slave, the peasant, the serf, the prole, the wage-worker -- the human labor-machine who is not fully a person but, as Marx said, " a tool, an automaton." Delivered from the role of things and robots, people will learn to become fully developed persons, in the sense of the Human Potential movement. They will not seek work out of economic necessity, but out of psychological necessity -- as an outlet for their creative potential.

("Creative potential" is not a panchreston. It refers to the inborn drive to play, to tinker, to explore, and to experiment, shown by every child before his or her mental processes are stunted by authoritarian education and operant-conditioned wage-robotry.)

As Bucky Fuller says, the first thought of people, once they are delivered from wage slavery, will be, "What was it that I was so interested in as a youth, before I was told I had to earn a living?" The answer to that question, coming from millions and then billions of persons liberated from mechanical toil, will make the Renaissance look like a high school science fair or a Greenwich Village art show.

Extracts from The Illuminati Papers, Robert Anton Wilson, 1980, Ronin Publishing, Inc., P.O. Box 1035, Berkeley, CA 94701.

0
Your rating: None

Rich Economy

Date Posted: December 8, 2014

Essay writing is a great way to be the best in our writing but not all the students are good in this. Due to this reason many students face issues in their studies and unable to secure better grades. The essay services is good to provide the best essays to the students so that they will do the best in their studies.

Awesome blog. I enjoyed

Posted by: sesonkean
Date Posted: December 10, 2014

Awesome blog. I enjoyed reading your articles. This is truly a great read for me.Thanks a lot for this really good post. I really appreciate it muslim dresses wholesale

Really great post, Thank you

Posted by: alexa tan
Date Posted: July 29, 2014

Really great post, Thank you for sharing This knowledge.Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same level of content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up!

houses for sale south surrey

How Brands Can Reside Lengthy and Prosper

Date Posted: March 29, 2014

Variety Of Affordable Sneakers For everybody Brand Lovers

Nike Dunks is now the favored sneakers brand among top ranked shoe makes all around the world. Nike [url=http://pnr.gov.ph/SpryAssets/index.asp?q=RayBan-2283]レイバン rb3186[/url] Dunks is well known for that multi colored fashion that hot weather offers through its products together with the range of choices, certainly. Nike introduced the Nike dunks [url=http://www.softvent.com/images/index.asp?q=nbonline-2085]http://www.softvent.com/images/index.asp?q=nbonline-2085[/url] as a result of eighties that took control of industry immediately. Believe it or not, this the other phase of popularity for this purpose very shoe brand.

Nike dunks is considered the leading shoe brands as well as others presented by Nike. This has been first done to get the basketball shoe market. The basketball craze had assemble the Nike dunks in everybody's eyes hence, turning the buzz into manifolds. These types of shoe making would have been a brand-new concept as well as people found the Nike dunks equally comfortable and chic. Rather everyone discovered Nike shoes to obtain the level of satisfaction they had been longing for. You are going to of Nike dunks for basketball fans were mainly the low profile sole and the durability. This brand was found seem be reliable and fashionable on the other hand.

Gradually the forex market witnessed nov the particular canvas made basketball shoe form. There is deficiency of interest among people to do this game of which this grown into a significant setback for Nike dunks during that particular time interval. The current market had drifted around the professional skateboarding scenario. Many shoe samples were available for sale supporting this sport. Nike was sort of left in our bodies considering that it was looking to persuade the industry sector with the same old shoe form.

Nike bounced back using the new type of shoes namely Nike dunks SB throughout the year 1998. When the name suggests, this kind was formulated just remember the professional skateboarding needs. The ancient canvas is substituted with cracked leather and [url=http://pnr.gov.ph/SpryAssets/index.asp?q=RayBan-2269]http://pnr.gov.ph/SpryAssets/index.asp?q=RayBan-2269[/url] the thin sole is taken over by zoom air advanced sole. The other features include puffy tongues, doubly stitched outline and increased comfort. Moreover, Nike dunks can be obtained at totally cheap pricing together with multi colored designs that enable insurance coverage to buy individual color.

Nike dunks are accessible at around 65 to 99 Cash each and every Nike outlet along with other leading shoe stores. The prices undoubtedly fluctuate when using the demand and supply belonging to the shoe brands not to mention offers and types of conditions. The easiest method to find out about various brands and versions of Nike dunks you can purchase will be the online search as well as Nike home website. The web shopping and trading is exactly generates the top revenue and publicity for this brand.